Malta vs Zimbabwe: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar over time
- Malta
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malta currently reports 437.57 million against 424.81 million in Zimbabwe, a difference of 12.76 million.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Malta ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.82 million | 113.16 million | 48.34 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 144.24 million | 48.43 million | 95.80 million | Malta |
| 2010s | 206.44 million | 140.30 million | 66.15 million | Malta |
| 2020s | 347.96 million | 346.83 million | 1.13 million | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar, Malta or Zimbabwe?
- Malta, at 437.57 million against 424.81 million in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar between Malta and Zimbabwe?
- 12.76 million, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Zimbabwe rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar?
- Malta ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the bilateral trade flows of low-carbon technology products, as well as country and world aggregates . Low carbon technology products produce less pollution than their traditional energy counterparts, and will play a vital role in the transition to a low carbon economy. Low carbon technologies include mechanics like wind turbines, solar panels, biomass systems and carbon capture equipment.