Albania vs Cuba: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Albania
-299.44 million
in 2024
Cuba
-293.01 million
in 2022
Albania rank
96th
Cuba rank
93rd
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Albania
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -293.01 million against -299.44 million in Albania, a difference of 6.43 million.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 96th and Cuba ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -18.68 million | -171.71 million | 153.02 million | Albania |
| 2000s | -51.35 million | -210.37 million | 159.03 million | Albania |
| 2010s | -80.37 million | -460.95 million | 380.59 million | Albania |
| 2020s | -130.48 million | -288.31 million | 157.82 million | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Albania or Cuba?
- Cuba, at -293.01 million against -299.44 million in Albania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Albania and Cuba?
- 6.43 million, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Cuba?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Albania and Cuba rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Albania ranks 96th and Cuba ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.