Algeria vs Finland: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Algeria
-2.88 billion
in 2017
Finland
-3.02 billion
in 2024
Algeria rank
163rd
Finland rank
164th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Algeria
- Finland
How they compare
Algeria currently reports -2.88 billion against -3.02 billion in Finland, a difference of 136.95 million.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 163rd and Finland ranks 164th of 187 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -562.75 million | 168.18 million | 730.93 million | Finland |
| 2000s | -1.36 billion | 845.49 million | 2.20 billion | Finland |
| 2010s | -3.28 billion | 1.52 billion | 4.80 billion | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Algeria or Finland?
- Algeria, at -2.88 billion against -3.02 billion in Finland as of 2017.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Algeria and Finland?
- 136.95 million, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Finland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.
- How do Algeria and Finland rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Algeria ranks 163rd and Finland ranks 164th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.