Armenia vs Congo: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Armenia
-238.87 million
in 2024
Congo
-216.23 million
in 2023
Armenia rank
84th
Congo rank
81st
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Armenia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports -216.23 million against -238.87 million in Armenia, a difference of 22.64 million.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 84th and Congo ranks 81st of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -109.10 million | -70.31 million | 38.79 million | Congo |
| 2010s | -103.51 million | -162.77 million | 59.26 million | Armenia |
| 2020s | -179.31 million | -104.66 million | 74.65 million | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Armenia or Congo?
- Congo, at -216.23 million against -238.87 million in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Armenia and Congo?
- 22.64 million, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Congo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Congo rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Armenia ranks 84th and Congo ranks 81st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.