Aruba vs Burundi: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Aruba
-34.10 million
in 2023
Burundi
-33.14 million
in 2023
Aruba rank
44th
Burundi rank
43rd
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Aruba
- Burundi
How they compare
Burundi currently reports -33.14 million against -34.10 million in Aruba, a difference of 960,200.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burundi ahead.
Aruba ranks 44th and Burundi ranks 43rd of 187 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -52.35 million | -8.94 million | 43.41 million | Burundi |
| 2010s | -25.55 million | -14.99 million | 10.57 million | Burundi |
| 2020s | -29.83 million | -27.24 million | 2.58 million | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Aruba or Burundi?
- Burundi, at -33.14 million against -34.10 million in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Aruba and Burundi?
- 960,200, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Burundi?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Burundi rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Aruba ranks 44th and Burundi ranks 43rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.