Aruba vs Eswatini: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Aruba
-34.10 million
in 2023
Eswatini
-36.94 million
in 2023
Aruba rank
44th
Eswatini rank
46th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Aruba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Aruba currently reports -34.10 million against -36.94 million in Eswatini, a difference of 2.85 million.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 44th and Eswatini ranks 46th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -52.35 million | -16.83 million | 35.52 million | Eswatini |
| 2010s | -25.55 million | -25.58 million | 22,980 | Aruba |
| 2020s | -29.83 million | -35.31 million | 5.48 million | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Aruba or Eswatini?
- Aruba, at -34.10 million against -36.94 million in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Aruba and Eswatini?
- 2.85 million, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eswatini?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Eswatini rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Aruba ranks 44th and Eswatini ranks 46th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.