Belgium vs Uzbekistan: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Belgium
-5.59 billion
in 2024
Uzbekistan
-4.29 billion
in 2024
Belgium rank
175th
Uzbekistan rank
173rd
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Belgium
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports -4.29 billion against -5.59 billion in Belgium, a difference of 1.30 billion.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Belgium ranks 175th and Uzbekistan ranks 173rd of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -932.24 million | -1.33 billion | 398.59 million | Belgium |
| 2020s | -3.90 billion | -2.30 billion | 1.60 billion | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Belgium or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at -4.29 billion against -5.59 billion in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Belgium and Uzbekistan?
- 1.30 billion, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Uzbekistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Uzbekistan rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Belgium ranks 175th and Uzbekistan ranks 173rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.