Belize vs Eswatini: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Belize
-46.43 million
in 2024
Eswatini
-36.94 million
in 2023
Belize rank
48th
Eswatini rank
46th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Belize
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -36.94 million against -46.43 million in Belize, a difference of 9.49 million.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 48th and Eswatini ranks 46th of 187 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -9.43 million | -16.88 million | 7.44 million | Belize |
| 2010s | -16.61 million | -25.58 million | 8.97 million | Belize |
| 2020s | -26.41 million | -35.31 million | 8.89 million | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Belize or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at -36.94 million against -46.43 million in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Belize and Eswatini?
- 9.49 million, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Eswatini rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Belize ranks 48th and Eswatini ranks 46th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.