Burundi vs Eswatini: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Burundi
-33.14 million
in 2023
Eswatini
-36.94 million
in 2023
Burundi rank
43rd
Eswatini rank
46th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Burundi
- Eswatini
How they compare
Burundi currently reports -33.14 million against -36.94 million in Eswatini, a difference of 3.81 million.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 43rd and Eswatini ranks 46th of 187 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5.51 million | -16.88 million | 11.37 million | Burundi |
| 2010s | -14.99 million | -25.58 million | 10.59 million | Burundi |
| 2020s | -27.24 million | -35.31 million | 8.07 million | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Burundi or Eswatini?
- Burundi, at -33.14 million against -36.94 million in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Burundi and Eswatini?
- 3.81 million, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Eswatini rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Burundi ranks 43rd and Eswatini ranks 46th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.