Burundi vs Sierra Leone: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Burundi
-33.14 million
in 2023
Sierra Leone
-32.65 million
in 2018
Burundi rank
43rd
Sierra Leone rank
41st
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Burundi
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports -32.65 million against -33.14 million in Burundi, a difference of 488,100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Burundi ranks 43rd and Sierra Leone ranks 41st of 187 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.83 million | -1.87 million | 43,777 | Burundi |
| 2010s | -13.04 million | -31.69 million | 18.65 million | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Burundi or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at -32.65 million against -33.14 million in Burundi as of 2018.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Burundi and Sierra Leone?
- 488,100, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Sierra Leone?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Burundi and Sierra Leone rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Burundi ranks 43rd and Sierra Leone ranks 41st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.