Congo vs Namibia: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Congo
-216.23 million
in 2023
Namibia
-227.58 million
in 2024
Congo rank
81st
Namibia rank
82nd
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Congo
- Namibia
How they compare
Congo currently reports -216.23 million against -227.58 million in Namibia, a difference of 11.35 million.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Namibia ahead.
Congo ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 82nd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -70.31 million | -122.97 million | 52.66 million | Congo |
| 2010s | -162.77 million | -141.65 million | 21.12 million | Namibia |
| 2020s | -104.66 million | -129.34 million | 24.68 million | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Congo or Namibia?
- Congo, at -216.23 million against -227.58 million in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Congo and Namibia?
- 11.35 million, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Congo ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 82nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.