Cuba vs Mozambique: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Cuba
-293.01 million
in 2022
Mozambique
-289.66 million
in 2024
Cuba rank
93rd
Mozambique rank
92nd
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cuba
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports -289.66 million against -293.01 million in Cuba, a difference of 3.35 million.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.
Cuba ranks 93rd and Mozambique ranks 92nd of 187 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -210.37 million | -43.44 million | 166.93 million | Mozambique |
| 2010s | -460.95 million | -234.45 million | 226.50 million | Mozambique |
| 2020s | -288.31 million | -285.82 million | 2.49 million | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cuba or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at -289.66 million against -293.01 million in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cuba and Mozambique?
- 3.35 million, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mozambique?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Mozambique rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cuba ranks 93rd and Mozambique ranks 92nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.