Cuba vs Tunisia: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Cuba
-293.01 million
in 2022
Tunisia
-297.49 million
in 2023
Cuba rank
93rd
Tunisia rank
95th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cuba
- Tunisia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -293.01 million against -297.49 million in Tunisia, a difference of 4.48 million.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 95th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -171.71 million | -232.88 million | 61.17 million | Cuba |
| 2000s | -210.37 million | -317.73 million | 107.36 million | Cuba |
| 2010s | -460.95 million | -437.63 million | 23.32 million | Tunisia |
| 2020s | -288.31 million | -303.98 million | 15.67 million | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cuba or Tunisia?
- Cuba, at -293.01 million against -297.49 million in Tunisia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cuba and Tunisia?
- 4.48 million, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tunisia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Tunisia rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cuba ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 95th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.