Ecuador vs Pakistan: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Ecuador
-997.06 million
in 2024
Pakistan
-1.11 billion
in 2024
Ecuador rank
139th
Pakistan rank
141st
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Ecuador
- Pakistan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -997.06 million against -1.11 billion in Pakistan, a difference of 108.70 million.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 139th and Pakistan ranks 141st of 187 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -208.56 million | -829.27 million | 620.71 million | Ecuador |
| 2010s | -630.55 million | -2.03 billion | 1.40 billion | Ecuador |
| 2020s | -756.23 million | -1.63 billion | 870.56 million | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Ecuador or Pakistan?
- Ecuador, at -997.06 million against -1.11 billion in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 108.70 million, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Ecuador ranks 139th and Pakistan ranks 141st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.