Faroe Islands vs Grenada: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Faroe Islands
-16.48 million
in 2009
Grenada
-20.30 million
in 2024
Faroe Islands rank
29th
Grenada rank
32nd
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Faroe Islands
- Grenada
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports -16.48 million against -20.30 million in Grenada, a difference of 3.82 million.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Grenada ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 29th and Grenada ranks 32nd of 187 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -7.47 million | -4.42 million | 3.05 million | Grenada |
| 2000s | -16.42 million | -6.28 million | 10.14 million | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Faroe Islands or Grenada?
- Faroe Islands, at -16.48 million against -20.30 million in Grenada as of 2009.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Faroe Islands and Grenada?
- 3.82 million, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Grenada?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2009.
- How do Faroe Islands and Grenada rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Faroe Islands ranks 29th and Grenada ranks 32nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.