Gambia vs Greenland: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Gambia
-21.38 million
in 2024
Greenland
-24.13 million
in 2018
Gambia rank
34th
Greenland rank
36th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Gambia
- Greenland
How they compare
Gambia currently reports -21.38 million against -24.13 million in Greenland, a difference of 2.75 million.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 34th and Greenland ranks 36th of 187 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3.41 million | -10.03 million | 6.62 million | Gambia |
| 2000s | -3.34 million | -11.85 million | 8.51 million | Gambia |
| 2010s | -7.12 million | -22.70 million | 15.58 million | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Gambia or Greenland?
- Gambia, at -21.38 million against -24.13 million in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Gambia and Greenland?
- 2.75 million, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Greenland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
- How do Gambia and Greenland rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Gambia ranks 34th and Greenland ranks 36th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.