Greenland vs Niger: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Greenland
-24.13 million
in 2018
Niger
-20.42 million
in 2024
Greenland rank
36th
Niger rank
33rd
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Greenland
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports -20.42 million against -24.13 million in Greenland, a difference of 3.71 million.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Niger ahead.
Greenland ranks 36th and Niger ranks 33rd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -10.03 million | -4.76 million | 5.27 million | Niger |
| 2000s | -11.85 million | -19.36 million | 7.51 million | Greenland |
| 2010s | -22.70 million | -72.90 million | 50.20 million | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Greenland or Niger?
- Niger, at -20.42 million against -24.13 million in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Greenland and Niger?
- 3.71 million, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Niger?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
- How do Greenland and Niger rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Greenland ranks 36th and Niger ranks 33rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.