Kazakhstan vs Qatar: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Kazakhstan
-2.33 billion
in 2024
Qatar
-2.33 billion
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
153rd
Qatar rank
152nd
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports -2.33 billion against -2.33 billion in Kazakhstan, a difference of 6.87 million.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 153rd and Qatar ranks 152nd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.01 billion | -1.04 billion | 35.00 million | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | -2.03 billion | -1.24 billion | 794.84 million | Qatar |
| 2020s | -938.74 million | -1.74 billion | 800.48 million | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Kazakhstan or Qatar?
- Qatar, at -2.33 billion against -2.33 billion in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Kazakhstan and Qatar?
- 6.87 million, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Qatar?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Qatar rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 153rd and Qatar ranks 152nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.