Latvia vs Mali: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Latvia
-198.01 million
in 2024
Mali
-168.06 million
in 2023
Latvia rank
80th
Mali rank
77th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Latvia
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports -168.06 million against -198.01 million in Latvia, a difference of 29.95 million.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mali ahead.
Latvia ranks 80th and Mali ranks 77th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -51.38 million | -40.51 million | 10.87 million | Mali |
| 2000s | -134.77 million | -54.95 million | 79.82 million | Mali |
| 2010s | -122.20 million | -124.51 million | 2.31 million | Latvia |
| 2020s | -209.53 million | -183.31 million | 26.22 million | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Latvia or Mali?
- Mali, at -168.06 million against -198.01 million in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Latvia and Mali?
- 29.95 million, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mali?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mali rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Latvia ranks 80th and Mali ranks 77th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.