Latvia vs Malta: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Latvia
-198.01 million
in 2024
Malta
-170.89 million
in 2024
Latvia rank
80th
Malta rank
78th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Latvia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports -170.89 million against -198.01 million in Latvia, a difference of 27.11 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 80th and Malta ranks 78th of 187 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -42.62 million | -42.04 million | 573,483 | Malta |
| 2000s | -134.77 million | -48.36 million | 86.41 million | Malta |
| 2010s | -122.20 million | -33.12 million | 89.08 million | Malta |
| 2020s | -207.23 million | -115.54 million | 91.68 million | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Latvia or Malta?
- Malta, at -170.89 million against -198.01 million in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Latvia and Malta?
- 27.11 million, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Latvia ranks 80th and Malta ranks 78th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.