Lesotho vs Lithuania: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Lesotho
-26.74 million
in 2024
Lithuania
-26.27 million
in 2024
Lesotho rank
38th
Lithuania rank
37th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Lesotho
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports -26.27 million against -26.74 million in Lesotho, a difference of 470,400.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 38th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5.15 million | -110.30 million | 105.16 million | Lesotho |
| 2010s | -13.07 million | 60.87 million | 73.94 million | Lithuania |
| 2020s | -26.21 million | -75.95 million | 49.74 million | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Lesotho or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at -26.27 million against -26.74 million in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Lesotho and Lithuania?
- 470,400, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Lithuania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and Lithuania rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Lesotho ranks 38th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.