Lesotho vs Sierra Leone: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Lesotho
-26.74 million
in 2024
Sierra Leone
-32.65 million
in 2018
Lesotho rank
38th
Sierra Leone rank
41st
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Lesotho
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports -26.74 million against -32.65 million in Sierra Leone, a difference of 5.91 million.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Lesotho ranks 38th and Sierra Leone ranks 41st of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -2.39 million | -2.10 million | 284,405 | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | -16.10 million | -31.69 million | 15.59 million | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Lesotho or Sierra Leone?
- Lesotho, at -26.74 million against -32.65 million in Sierra Leone as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Lesotho and Sierra Leone?
- 5.91 million, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Sierra Leone?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
- How do Lesotho and Sierra Leone rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Lesotho ranks 38th and Sierra Leone ranks 41st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.