Malawi vs Tajikistan: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Malawi
-88.75 million
in 2024
Tajikistan
-101.03 million
in 2023
Malawi rank
61st
Tajikistan rank
64th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Malawi
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Malawi currently reports -88.75 million against -101.03 million in Tajikistan, a difference of 12.28 million.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 61st and Tajikistan ranks 64th of 187 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -69.75 million | -94.16 million | 24.41 million | Malawi |
| 2020s | -77.63 million | -119.09 million | 41.46 million | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Malawi or Tajikistan?
- Malawi, at -88.75 million against -101.03 million in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Malawi and Tajikistan?
- 12.28 million, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tajikistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Tajikistan rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Malawi ranks 61st and Tajikistan ranks 64th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.