Myanmar vs Sri Lanka: Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Myanmar
-260.05 million
in 2024
Sri Lanka
-257.97 million
in 2024
Myanmar rank
89th
Sri Lanka rank
87th
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Myanmar
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports -257.97 million against -260.05 million in Myanmar, a difference of 2.08 million.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 89th and Sri Lanka ranks 87th of 187 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -368.16 million | -348.01 million | 20.15 million | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | -404.97 million | -287.75 million | 117.22 million | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Myanmar or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at -257.97 million against -260.05 million in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Myanmar and Sri Lanka?
- 2.08 million, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Sri Lanka rank globally for trade balance in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Myanmar ranks 89th and Sri Lanka ranks 87th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade balance in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.