Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Trade, S1 - Payment restrictions for international trade
Indonesia
0.8125
in 2014
Zimbabwe
0.8125
in 2014
Indonesia rank
56th
Zimbabwe rank
56th
Trade, S1 - Payment restrictions for international trade over time
- Indonesia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.8125 against 0.8125 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 56th and Zimbabwe ranks 56th of 90 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.75 | 0.3125 | 0.4375 | Indonesia |
| 1980s | 0.75 | 0.2562 | 0.4938 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.75 | 0.3563 | 0.3937 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.7625 | 0.3375 | 0.425 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.8125 | 0.8125 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade, s1 - payment restrictions for international trade, Indonesia or Zimbabwe?
- Indonesia, at 0.8125 against 0.8125 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trade, s1 - payment restrictions for international trade between Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for trade, s1 - payment restrictions for international trade?
- Indonesia ranks 56th and Zimbabwe ranks 56th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Trade, S1 - Payment restrictions for international trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.