Chile vs New Zealand: Trade, S2 - Restrictions on payments for good imports
Chile
2
in 2014
New Zealand
2
in 2014
Chile rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Trade, S2 - Restrictions on payments for good imports over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 2 against 2 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was New Zealand ahead.
Chile ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 90 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.07 | 1 | 0.0714 | Chile |
| 1980s | 1.5 | 1.35 | 0.15 | Chile |
| 1990s | 1.5 | 2 | 0.5 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 1.95 | 2 | 0.05 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade, s2 - restrictions on payments for good imports, Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 2 against 2 in New Zealand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trade, s2 - restrictions on payments for good imports between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for trade, s2 - restrictions on payments for good imports?
- Chile ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Trade, S2 - Restrictions on payments for good imports. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.