Ethiopia vs Malaysia: Trade, S2 - Restrictions on payments for good imports
Ethiopia
1.5
in 2014
Malaysia
1.5
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
51st
Malaysia rank
51st
Trade, S2 - Restrictions on payments for good imports over time
- Ethiopia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 1.5 against 1.5 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 51st and Malaysia ranks 51st of 90 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 1.05 | 1.5 | 0.45 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade, s2 - restrictions on payments for good imports, Ethiopia or Malaysia?
- Ethiopia, at 1.5 against 1.5 in Malaysia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trade, s2 - restrictions on payments for good imports between Ethiopia and Malaysia?
- 0, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Malaysia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Ethiopia and Malaysia rank globally for trade, s2 - restrictions on payments for good imports?
- Ethiopia ranks 51st and Malaysia ranks 51st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Trade, S2 - Restrictions on payments for good imports. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.