Kenya vs Malaysia: Trade, S2 - Restrictions on receipts from good exports
Kenya
1.5
in 2014
Malaysia
1.5
in 2014
Kenya rank
48th
Malaysia rank
48th
Trade, S2 - Restrictions on receipts from good exports over time
- Kenya
- Malaysia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 1.5 against 1.5 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 48th and Malaysia ranks 48th of 90 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 1.1 | 1.5 | 0.4 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade, s2 - restrictions on receipts from good exports, Kenya or Malaysia?
- Kenya, at 1.5 against 1.5 in Malaysia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trade, s2 - restrictions on receipts from good exports between Kenya and Malaysia?
- 0, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Malaysia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Kenya and Malaysia rank globally for trade, s2 - restrictions on receipts from good exports?
- Kenya ranks 48th and Malaysia ranks 48th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Trade, S2 - Restrictions on receipts from good exports. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.