Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Trade, S2 - Restrictions on receipts from service exports
Hong Kong, China
2
in 2014
Latvia
2
in 2014
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Trade, S2 - Restrictions on receipts from service exports over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 2 against 2 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 90 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2 | 1.94 | 0.0625 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade, s2 - restrictions on receipts from service exports, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 2 against 2 in Latvia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trade, s2 - restrictions on receipts from service exports between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for trade, s2 - restrictions on receipts from service exports?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Trade, S2 - Restrictions on receipts from service exports. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.