Export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan: Export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent was 0.5872 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Turkmenistan, 1993–2014
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
The most recent figure for export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Turkmenistan is 0.5872, measured in 2014.
That represents a change of down 2.4% on the previous year and up 11.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Turkmenistan peaked at 0.6209 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.4912, in 2001.
Turkmenistan ranks 2nd of 166 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 22 years of available data.
Export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Turkmenistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 0.5768 | — |
| 1994 | 0.5562 | -3.6% |
| 1995 | 0.5434 | -2.3% |
| 1996 | 0.559 | +2.9% |
| 1997 | 0.5565 | -0.4% |
| 1998 | 0.5436 | -2.3% |
| 1999 | 0.5619 | +3.4% |
| 2000 | 0.5615 | -0.1% |
| 2001 | 0.4912 | -12.5% |
| 2002 | 0.5255 | +7.0% |
| 2003 | 0.5288 | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 0.5287 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.5279 | -0.1% |
| 2006 | 0.5549 | +5.1% |
| 2007 | 0.5823 | +4.9% |
| 2008 | 0.5995 | +2.9% |
| 2009 | 0.5765 | -3.8% |
| 2010 | 0.6067 | +5.2% |
| 2011 | 0.6209 | +2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.5768 | -7.1% |
| 2013 | 0.6017 | +4.3% |
| 2014 | 0.5872 | -2.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5568 | 0.5434 | 0.5768 | 7 |
| 2000s | 0.5477 | 0.4912 | 0.5995 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5987 | 0.5768 | 0.6209 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Turkmenistan
- 1 Sudan 0.6209 compare
- 2 Angola 0.5872 compare
- 2 Albania 0.5872 compare
- 2 United Arab Emirates 0.5872 compare
- 2 Argentina 0.5872 compare
- 2 Armenia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0.5872 compare
- 2 Australia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Austria 0.5872 compare
- 2 Azerbaijan 0.5872 compare
- 2 Burundi 0.5872 compare
- 2 Belgium 0.5872 compare
- 2 Benin 0.5872 compare
- 2 Burkina Faso 0.5872 compare
- 2 Bangladesh 0.5872 compare
- 2 Bulgaria 0.5872 compare
- 2 Bahrain 0.5872 compare
- 2 Bahamas 0.5872 compare
- 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.5872 compare
- 2 Belarus 0.5872 compare
- 2 Belize 0.5872 compare
- 2 Bolivia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Brazil 0.5872 compare
- 2 Barbados 0.5872 compare
- 2 Botswana 0.5872 compare
- 2 Central African Republic 0.5872 compare
- 2 Canada 0.5872 compare
- 2 Switzerland 0.5872 compare
- 2 Chile 0.5872 compare
- 2 China 0.5872 compare
- 2 Cote d'Ivoire 0.5872 compare
- 2 Cameroon 0.5872 compare
- 2 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.5872 compare
- 2 Congo 0.5872 compare
- 2 Colombia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Comoros 0.5872 compare
- 2 Cape Verde 0.5872 compare
- 2 Costa Rica 0.5872 compare
- 2 Cyprus 0.5872 compare
- 2 Czechia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Germany 0.5872 compare
- 2 Djibouti 0.5872 compare
- 2 Dominica 0.5872 compare
- 2 Denmark 0.5872 compare
- 2 Dominican Republic 0.5872 compare
- 2 Algeria 0.5872 compare
- 2 Ecuador 0.5872 compare
- 2 Egypt 0.5872 compare
- 2 Spain 0.5872 compare
- 2 Estonia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Ethiopia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Finland 0.5872 compare
- 2 Fiji 0.5872 compare
- 2 France 0.5872 compare
- 2 Gabon 0.5872 compare
- 2 United Kingdom 0.5872 compare
- 2 Georgia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Ghana 0.5872 compare
- 2 Guinea 0.5872 compare
- 2 Gambia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Guinea-Bissau 0.5872 compare
- 2 Equatorial Guinea 0.5872 compare
- 2 Greece 0.5872 compare
- 2 Grenada 0.5872 compare
- 2 Guatemala 0.5872 compare
- 2 Hong Kong 0.5872 compare
- 2 Honduras 0.5872 compare
- 2 Croatia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Haiti 0.5872 compare
- 2 Hungary 0.5872 compare
- 2 Indonesia 0.5872 compare
- 2 India 0.5872 compare
- 2 Ireland 0.5872 compare
- 2 Iran 0.5872 compare
- 2 Iraq 0.5872 compare
- 2 Iceland 0.5872 compare
- 2 Israel 0.5872 compare
- 2 Italy 0.5872 compare
- 2 Jamaica 0.5872 compare
- 2 Jordan 0.5872 compare
- 2 Japan 0.5872 compare
- 2 Kazakhstan 0.5872 compare
- 2 Kenya 0.5872 compare
- 2 Kyrgyzstan 0.5872 compare
- 2 Cambodia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.5872 compare
- 2 South Korea 0.5872 compare
- 2 Kuwait 0.5872 compare
- 2 Laos 0.5872 compare
- 2 Lebanon 0.5872 compare
- 2 Liberia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Saint Lucia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Sri Lanka 0.5872 compare
- 2 Lesotho 0.5872 compare
- 2 Lithuania 0.5872 compare
- 2 Luxembourg 0.5872 compare
- 2 Latvia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Morocco 0.5872 compare
- 2 Moldova 0.5872 compare
- 2 Madagascar 0.5872 compare
- 2 Maldives 0.5872 compare
- 2 Mexico 0.5872 compare
- 2 North Macedonia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Mali 0.5872 compare
- 2 Malta 0.5872 compare
- 2 Myanmar 0.5872 compare
- 2 Mongolia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Mozambique 0.5872 compare
- 2 Mauritania 0.5872 compare
- 2 Mauritius 0.5872 compare
- 2 Malawi 0.5872 compare
- 2 Malaysia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Namibia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Niger 0.5872 compare
- 2 Nigeria 0.5872 compare
- 2 Nicaragua 0.5872 compare
- 2 Netherlands 0.5872 compare
- 2 Norway 0.5872 compare
- 2 Nepal 0.5872 compare
- 2 New Zealand 0.5872 compare
- 2 Oman 0.5872 compare
- 2 Pakistan 0.5872 compare
- 2 Panama 0.5872 compare
- 2 Peru 0.5872 compare
- 2 Philippines 0.5872 compare
- 2 Poland 0.5872 compare
- 2 Portugal 0.5872 compare
- 2 Paraguay 0.5872 compare
- 2 Qatar 0.5872 compare
- 2 Romania 0.5872 compare
- 2 Russia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Rwanda 0.5872 compare
- 2 Saudi Arabia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Senegal 0.5872 compare
- 2 Singapore 0.5872 compare
- 2 Sierra Leone 0.5872 compare
- 2 El Salvador 0.5872 compare
- 2 Sao Tome and Principe 0.5872 compare
- 2 Suriname 0.5872 compare
- 2 Slovakia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Slovenia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Sweden 0.5872 compare
- 2 Eswatini 0.5872 compare
- 2 Seychelles 0.5872 compare
- 2 Syria 0.5872 compare
- 2 Chad 0.5872 compare
- 2 Togo 0.5872 compare
- 2 Thailand 0.5872 compare
- 2 Tajikistan 0.5872 compare
- 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0.5872 compare
- 2 Tunisia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Turkey 0.5872 compare
- 2 Tanzania 0.5872 compare
- 2 Uganda 0.5872 compare
- 2 Ukraine 0.5872 compare
- 2 Uruguay 0.5872 compare
- 2 United States 0.5872 compare
- 2 Uzbekistan 0.5872 compare
- 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.5872 compare
- 2 Venezuela 0.5872 compare
- 2 Vietnam 0.5872 compare
- 2 Yemen 0.5872 compare
- 2 South Africa 0.5872 compare
- 2 Zambia 0.5872 compare
- 2 Zimbabwe 0.5872 compare
More trade data for Turkmenistan
- Commodity Net Export Price Index, Individual Commodities Weighted by 83.82 (2025)
- Commodity Net Export Price Index, Individual Commodities Weighted by 95.77 (2025)
- Commodity Export Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 95.43 (2025)
- Commodity Export Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 81.54 (2025)
- Commodity Import Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 99.65 (2025)
- Commodity Import Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 83.9 (2025)
- Extensive Margin, Theil index 0.0276 (2014)
- Export Diversification, Theil index 5.43 (2014)
- Intensive Margin, Theil index 5.4 (2014)
- Import quality, Mean, US dollar 0.8823 (2014)
Frequently asked questions
- What is export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Turkmenistan?
- Export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Turkmenistan was 0.5872 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6209 in 2011.
- What is the lowest export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4912 in 2001.
- How does Turkmenistan rank for export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent?
- Turkmenistan ranks 2nd out of 166 countries with data for 2014.
- Is export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent rising or falling in Turkmenistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Turkmenistan data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Export unit values, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.