Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per in Guinea

Guinea: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per was 5.61 units per person in 2016. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2016)
5.61 units per person
Change on year
down 7.3%
World rank
171st
of 181 countries
All-time high
7.17 units per person
in 2013
All-time low
0.9733 units per person
in 2000
Years of data
17
1995–2016

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per in Guinea, 1995–2016

024681995200520161995: 1.7 units per person1996: 2.6 units per person1997: 3.4 units per person1998: 1.8 units per person1999: 2.2 units per person2000: 0.973 units per person2001: 1.4 units per person2002: 1 units per person2004: 2.2 units per person2005: 2.1 units per person2006: 2.6 units per person2007: 3.7 units per person2008: 4.9 units per person2013: 7.2 units per person2014: 4.6 units per person2015: 6.1 units per person2016: 5.6 units per person

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per person.

Analysis

Guinea recorded 5.61 units per person for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per in 2016.

The figure is down 7.3% on the previous year and up 111.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per in Guinea peaked at 7.17 units per person in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.9733 units per person, in 2000.

Guinea ranks 171st of 181 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per in Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita in Guinea, 1995 to 2016.
Year units per person Change
1995 1.67 units per person
1996 2.56 units per person +52.9%
1997 3.4 units per person +33.0%
1998 1.83 units per person -46.1%
1999 2.18 units per person +18.8%
2000 0.9733 units per person -55.3%
2001 1.43 units per person +46.9%
2002 1.04 units per person -27.5%
2004 2.21 units per person +112.9%
2005 2.14 units per person -3.1%
2006 2.65 units per person +23.8%
2007 3.66 units per person +38.2%
2008 4.95 units per person +35.1%
2013 7.17 units per person +44.9%
2014 4.61 units per person -35.6%
2015 6.05 units per person +31.2%
2016 5.61 units per person -7.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 2.33 units per person 1.67 units per person 3.4 units per person 5
2000s 2.38 units per person 0.9733 units per person 4.95 units per person 8
2010s 5.86 units per person 4.61 units per person 7.17 units per person 4

Countries ranked near Guinea

  1. 168 Myanmar 6.37 units per person compare
  2. 169 Nigeria 6.28 units per person compare
  3. 170 Liberia 5.81 units per person
  4. 172 Pakistan 5.52 units per person compare
  5. 173 Sudan 5.33 units per person compare
  6. 174 Benin 5.16 units per person compare

See the full ranking of 182 places →

More trade data for Guinea

All data for Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per in Guinea?
Total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per in Guinea was 5.61 units per person in 2016, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per recorded in Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 7.17 units per person in 2013.
What is the lowest total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per recorded in Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 0.9733 units per person in 2000.
How does Guinea rank for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
Guinea ranks 171st out of 181 countries with data for 2016.
Is total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per rising or falling in Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is up 111.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Guinea data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per in Guinea. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/stat/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-capita/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/stat/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-capita/guinea/">Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per in Guinea</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 4,619 data points, 1994–2024
Last refreshed

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.