Chile vs Hong Kong, China: CO2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, Metric ton of CO₂

Chile
95.62
in 2018
Hong Kong, China
143.1
in 2018
Chile rank
31st
Hong Kong, China rank
29th

CO2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, Metric ton of CO₂ over time

  • Chile
  • Hong Kong, China
5075100125150199520062018

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 143.1 against 95.62 in Chile, a difference of 47.48.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.5 times Chile's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 31st and Hong Kong, China ranks 29th of 66 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 50.32 110.93 60.61 Hong Kong, China
2000s 61.41 102.73 41.31 Hong Kong, China
2010s 90.26 131.4 41.14 Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, metric ton of co₂, Chile or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 143.1 against 95.62 in Chile as of 2018.
What is the difference in co2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, metric ton of co₂ between Chile and Hong Kong, China?
47.48, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hong Kong, China?
24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
How do Chile and Hong Kong, China rank globally for co2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, metric ton of co₂?
Chile ranks 31st and Hong Kong, China ranks 29th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as CO2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, Metric ton of CO₂ equivalent. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Hong Kong, China: CO2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, Metric ton of CO₂. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-embodied-in-final-domestic-demand-metric-ton-of-co2-equivalent/chile/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-embodied-in-final-domestic-demand-metric-ton-of-co2-equivalent/chile/hong-kong-sar-china/">Chile vs Hong Kong, China: CO2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, Metric ton of CO₂</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions embodied in final domestic demand, Metric ton of CO₂ equivalent
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
67 places, 1,608 data points, 1995–2018
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual, country-level estimates of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions resulting from fuel combustion, which are embodied in domestic final demand, production, and trade. The data covers a substantial period, with estimates for emissions embodied in production and final demand available for 66 countries from 1995 to 2018. Additionally, the dataset includes annual country-level estimates for CO2 emissions embodied in gross exports and gross imports for the same 66 countries, extending to the years 1995 to 2020. All emissions are measured in million tons of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2 eq.). The compilation relies on several authoritative sources; specifically, the total value of merchandise exports and imports is taken from the Direction of Trade Statistics (DOTS). Furthermore, the CO2 emissions embodied in international trade are derived from the OECD's 2021 compilation of indicators on Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade, which itself is a product of combining the Input-Output Database and the Trade in embodied CO2 (TeCO2) Database.