Hong Kong vs South Korea: Export quality, 95: upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural)
Export quality, 95: upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural) over time
- Hong Kong
- South Korea
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 1.06 against 1.06 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
Across all 52 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 2nd and South Korea ranks 2nd of 166 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent, Hong Kong or South Korea?
- Hong Kong, at 1.06 against 1.06 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent between Hong Kong and South Korea?
- 0, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and South Korea?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and South Korea rank globally for export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent?
- Hong Kong ranks 2nd and South Korea ranks 2nd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.