Statizoid

Export quality, 95: upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural) in Hong Kong

Hong Kong: Export quality, 95: upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural) was 1.06 in 2014. ▼ Falling

Latest (2014)
1.06
Change on year
down 0.4%
World rank
2nd
of 166 countries
All-time high
1.11
in 1966
All-time low
1.05
in 1995
Years of data
52
1963–2014

Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Hong Kong, 1963–2014

00.250.50.751196319882014

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

The most recent figure for export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Hong Kong is 1.06, measured in 2014.

That represents a change of down 0.4% on the previous year and down 0.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Hong Kong peaked at 1.11 in 1966 and was at its lowest, 1.05, in 1995.

That places Hong Kong 2nd out of 166 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 52 years of available data.

Export quality, 95: upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural) in Hong Kong, year by year

Year Value Change
1963 1.11 —
1964 1.11 +0.4%
1965 1.11 +0.0%
1966 1.11 +0.1%
1967 1.11 -0.7%
1968 1.11 +0.0%
1969 1.11 +0.1%
1970 1.1 -0.3%
1971 1.11 +0.4%
1972 1.11 +0.3%
1973 1.11 -0.5%
1974 1.1 -0.3%
1975 1.09 -1.4%
1976 1.11 +2.4%
1977 1.1 -1.2%
1978 1.1 -0.2%
1979 1.09 -0.8%
1980 1.09 +0.3%
1981 1.07 -1.8%
1982 1.07 +0.1%
1983 1.08 +0.2%
1984 1.07 -0.3%
1985 1.08 +0.8%
1986 1.08 +0.3%
1987 1.07 -1.2%
1988 1.08 +1.0%
1989 1.07 -1.0%
1990 1.09 +1.4%
1991 1.09 -0.2%
1992 1.07 -1.1%
1993 1.07 -0.8%
1994 1.06 -0.6%
1995 1.05 -1.3%
1996 1.05 +0.6%
1997 1.06 +0.9%
1998 1.06 +0.3%
1999 1.06 -0.4%
2000 1.07 +1.3%
2001 1.06 -1.0%
2002 1.07 +1.1%
2003 1.06 -1.5%
2004 1.06 +0.2%
2005 1.06 -0.4%
2006 1.07 +1.0%
2007 1.05 -1.5%
2008 1.05 -0.0%
2009 1.06 +0.9%
2010 1.06 +0.1%
2011 1.06 +0.0%
2012 1.06 +0.1%
2013 1.06 -0.2%
2014 1.06 -0.4%

Hong Kong compared with similar countries

  • Hong Kong's 1.06 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.06, 1.0× the median. (57 countries reporting)
  • Hong Kong's 1.06 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.06, 1.0× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 1.11 1.11 1.11 7
1970s 1.1 1.09 1.11 10
1980s 1.08 1.07 1.09 10
1990s 1.07 1.05 1.09 10
2000s 1.06 1.05 1.07 10
2010s 1.06 1.06 1.06 5

Countries ranked near Hong Kong

  1. 1 Sudan 1.06 compare
  2. 2 Angola 1.06 compare
  3. 2 Albania 1.06 compare
  4. 2 United Arab Emirates 1.06 compare
  5. 2 Argentina 1.06 compare
  6. 2 Armenia 1.06 compare
  7. 2 Antigua and Barbuda 1.06 compare
  8. 2 Australia 1.06 compare
  9. 2 Austria 1.06 compare
  10. 2 Azerbaijan 1.06 compare
  11. 2 Burundi 1.06 compare
  12. 2 Belgium 1.06 compare
  13. 2 Benin 1.06 compare
  14. 2 Burkina Faso 1.06 compare
  15. 2 Bangladesh 1.06 compare
  16. 2 Bulgaria 1.06 compare
  17. 2 Bahrain 1.06 compare
  18. 2 Bahamas 1.06 compare
  19. 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.06 compare
  20. 2 Belarus 1.06 compare
  21. 2 Belize 1.06 compare
  22. 2 Bolivia 1.06 compare
  23. 2 Brazil 1.06 compare
  24. 2 Barbados 1.06 compare
  25. 2 Botswana 1.06 compare
  26. 2 Central African Republic 1.06 compare
  27. 2 Canada 1.06 compare
  28. 2 Switzerland 1.06 compare
  29. 2 Chile 1.06 compare
  30. 2 China 1.06 compare
  31. 2 Cote d'Ivoire 1.06 compare
  32. 2 Cameroon 1.06 compare
  33. 2 Democratic Republic of Congo 1.06 compare
  34. 2 Congo 1.06 compare
  35. 2 Colombia 1.06 compare
  36. 2 Comoros 1.06 compare
  37. 2 Cape Verde 1.06 compare
  38. 2 Costa Rica 1.06 compare
  39. 2 Cyprus 1.06 compare
  40. 2 Czechia 1.06 compare
  41. 2 Germany 1.06 compare
  42. 2 Djibouti 1.06 compare
  43. 2 Dominica 1.06 compare
  44. 2 Denmark 1.06 compare
  45. 2 Dominican Republic 1.06 compare
  46. 2 Algeria 1.06 compare
  47. 2 Ecuador 1.06 compare
  48. 2 Egypt 1.06 compare
  49. 2 Spain 1.06 compare
  50. 2 Estonia 1.06 compare
  51. 2 Ethiopia 1.06 compare
  52. 2 Finland 1.06 compare
  53. 2 Fiji 1.06 compare
  54. 2 France 1.06 compare
  55. 2 Gabon 1.06 compare
  56. 2 United Kingdom 1.06 compare
  57. 2 Georgia 1.06 compare
  58. 2 Ghana 1.06 compare
  59. 2 Guinea 1.06 compare
  60. 2 Gambia 1.06 compare
  61. 2 Guinea-Bissau 1.06 compare
  62. 2 Equatorial Guinea 1.06 compare
  63. 2 Greece 1.06 compare
  64. 2 Grenada 1.06 compare
  65. 2 Guatemala 1.06 compare
  66. 2 Honduras 1.06 compare
  67. 2 Croatia 1.06 compare
  68. 2 Haiti 1.06 compare
  69. 2 Hungary 1.06 compare
  70. 2 Indonesia 1.06 compare
  71. 2 India 1.06 compare
  72. 2 Ireland 1.06 compare
  73. 2 Iran 1.06 compare
  74. 2 Iraq 1.06 compare
  75. 2 Iceland 1.06 compare
  76. 2 Israel 1.06 compare
  77. 2 Italy 1.06 compare
  78. 2 Jamaica 1.06 compare
  79. 2 Jordan 1.06 compare
  80. 2 Japan 1.06 compare
  81. 2 Kazakhstan 1.06 compare
  82. 2 Kenya 1.06 compare
  83. 2 Kyrgyzstan 1.06 compare
  84. 2 Cambodia 1.06 compare
  85. 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1.06 compare
  86. 2 South Korea 1.06 compare
  87. 2 Kuwait 1.06 compare
  88. 2 Laos 1.06 compare
  89. 2 Lebanon 1.06 compare
  90. 2 Liberia 1.06 compare
  91. 2 Saint Lucia 1.06 compare
  92. 2 Sri Lanka 1.06 compare
  93. 2 Lesotho 1.06 compare
  94. 2 Lithuania 1.06 compare
  95. 2 Luxembourg 1.06 compare
  96. 2 Latvia 1.06 compare
  97. 2 Morocco 1.06 compare
  98. 2 Moldova 1.06 compare
  99. 2 Madagascar 1.06 compare
  100. 2 Maldives 1.06 compare
  101. 2 Mexico 1.06 compare
  102. 2 North Macedonia 1.06 compare
  103. 2 Mali 1.06 compare
  104. 2 Malta 1.06 compare
  105. 2 Myanmar 1.06 compare
  106. 2 Mongolia 1.06 compare
  107. 2 Mozambique 1.06 compare
  108. 2 Mauritania 1.06 compare
  109. 2 Mauritius 1.06 compare
  110. 2 Malawi 1.06 compare
  111. 2 Malaysia 1.06 compare
  112. 2 Namibia 1.06 compare
  113. 2 Niger 1.06 compare
  114. 2 Nigeria 1.06 compare
  115. 2 Nicaragua 1.06 compare
  116. 2 Netherlands 1.06 compare
  117. 2 Norway 1.06 compare
  118. 2 Nepal 1.06 compare
  119. 2 New Zealand 1.06 compare
  120. 2 Oman 1.06 compare
  121. 2 Pakistan 1.06 compare
  122. 2 Panama 1.06 compare
  123. 2 Peru 1.06 compare
  124. 2 Philippines 1.06 compare
  125. 2 Poland 1.06 compare
  126. 2 Portugal 1.06 compare
  127. 2 Paraguay 1.06 compare
  128. 2 Qatar 1.06 compare
  129. 2 Romania 1.06 compare
  130. 2 Russia 1.06 compare
  131. 2 Rwanda 1.06 compare
  132. 2 Saudi Arabia 1.06 compare
  133. 2 Senegal 1.06 compare
  134. 2 Singapore 1.06 compare
  135. 2 Sierra Leone 1.06 compare
  136. 2 El Salvador 1.06 compare
  137. 2 Sao Tome and Principe 1.06 compare
  138. 2 Suriname 1.06 compare
  139. 2 Slovakia 1.06 compare
  140. 2 Slovenia 1.06 compare
  141. 2 Sweden 1.06 compare
  142. 2 Eswatini 1.06 compare
  143. 2 Seychelles 1.06 compare
  144. 2 Syria 1.06 compare
  145. 2 Chad 1.06 compare
  146. 2 Togo 1.06 compare
  147. 2 Thailand 1.06 compare
  148. 2 Tajikistan 1.06 compare
  149. 2 Turkmenistan 1.06 compare
  150. 2 Trinidad and Tobago 1.06 compare
  151. 2 Tunisia 1.06 compare
  152. 2 Turkey 1.06 compare
  153. 2 Tanzania 1.06 compare
  154. 2 Uganda 1.06 compare
  155. 2 Ukraine 1.06 compare
  156. 2 Uruguay 1.06 compare
  157. 2 United States 1.06 compare
  158. 2 Uzbekistan 1.06 compare
  159. 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1.06 compare
  160. 2 Venezuela 1.06 compare
  161. 2 Vietnam 1.06 compare
  162. 2 Yemen 1.06 compare
  163. 2 South Africa 1.06 compare
  164. 2 Zambia 1.06 compare
  165. 2 Zimbabwe 1.06 compare

See the full ranking of 166 places →

More trade data for Hong Kong

All data for Hong Kong →

Frequently asked questions

What is export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Hong Kong?
Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Hong Kong was 1.06 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent recorded in Hong Kong?
The highest recorded value was 1.11 in 1966.
What is the lowest export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent recorded in Hong Kong?
The lowest recorded value was 1.05 in 1995.
How does Hong Kong rank for export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent?
Hong Kong ranks 2nd out of 166 countries with data for 2014.
Is export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent rising or falling in Hong Kong?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Hong Kong. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/stat/export-quality-95-percent-interval-upper-bound-percent-acm1-agricultural-products/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/stat/export-quality-95-percent-interval-upper-bound-percent-acm1-agricultural-products/hong-kong-sar-china/">Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Hong Kong</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural products)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 7,433 data points, 1963–2014
Last refreshed

This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.