Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Viet Nam
Viet Nam: Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent was 1.06 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Viet Nam, 1976–2014
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
Viet Nam recorded 1.06 for export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in 2014.
The figure is down 0.4% on the previous year and down 0.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Viet Nam peaked at 1.11 in 1976 and was at its lowest, 1.05, in 1995.
Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 166 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent in Viet Nam, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 1.11 | — |
| 1977 | 1.1 | -1.2% |
| 1978 | 1.1 | -0.2% |
| 1979 | 1.09 | -0.8% |
| 1980 | 1.09 | +0.3% |
| 1981 | 1.07 | -1.8% |
| 1982 | 1.07 | +0.1% |
| 1983 | 1.08 | +0.2% |
| 1984 | 1.07 | -0.3% |
| 1985 | 1.08 | +0.8% |
| 1986 | 1.08 | +0.3% |
| 1987 | 1.07 | -1.2% |
| 1988 | 1.08 | +1.0% |
| 1989 | 1.07 | -1.0% |
| 1990 | 1.09 | +1.4% |
| 1991 | 1.09 | -0.2% |
| 1992 | 1.07 | -1.1% |
| 1993 | 1.07 | -0.8% |
| 1994 | 1.06 | -0.6% |
| 1995 | 1.05 | -1.3% |
| 1996 | 1.05 | +0.6% |
| 1997 | 1.06 | +0.9% |
| 1998 | 1.06 | +0.3% |
| 1999 | 1.06 | -0.4% |
| 2000 | 1.07 | +1.3% |
| 2001 | 1.06 | -1.0% |
| 2002 | 1.07 | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 1.06 | -1.5% |
| 2004 | 1.06 | +0.2% |
| 2005 | 1.06 | -0.4% |
| 2006 | 1.07 | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 1.05 | -1.5% |
| 2008 | 1.05 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.06 | +0.9% |
| 2010 | 1.06 | +0.1% |
| 2011 | 1.06 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.06 | +0.1% |
| 2013 | 1.06 | -0.2% |
| 2014 | 1.06 | -0.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.1 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 4 |
| 1980s | 1.08 | 1.07 | 1.09 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.07 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.06 | 1.05 | 1.07 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Viet Nam
- 1 Sudan 1.06 compare
- 2 Angola 1.06 compare
- 2 Albania 1.06 compare
- 2 United Arab Emirates 1.06 compare
- 2 Argentina 1.06 compare
- 2 Armenia 1.06 compare
- 2 Antigua and Barbuda 1.06 compare
- 2 Australia 1.06 compare
- 2 Austria 1.06 compare
- 2 Azerbaijan 1.06 compare
- 2 Burundi 1.06 compare
- 2 Belgium 1.06 compare
- 2 Benin 1.06 compare
- 2 Burkina Faso 1.06 compare
- 2 Bangladesh 1.06 compare
- 2 Bulgaria 1.06 compare
- 2 Bahrain 1.06 compare
- 2 Bahamas 1.06 compare
- 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.06 compare
- 2 Belarus 1.06 compare
- 2 Belize 1.06 compare
- 2 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1.06 compare
- 2 Brazil 1.06 compare
- 2 Barbados 1.06 compare
- 2 Botswana 1.06 compare
- 2 Central African Republic 1.06 compare
- 2 Canada 1.06 compare
- 2 Switzerland 1.06 compare
- 2 Chile 1.06 compare
- 2 China 1.06 compare
- 2 Côte d'Ivoire 1.06 compare
- 2 Cameroon 1.06 compare
- 2 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 1.06 compare
- 2 Congo 1.06 compare
- 2 Colombia 1.06 compare
- 2 Comoros 1.06 compare
- 2 Cape Verde 1.06 compare
- 2 Costa Rica 1.06 compare
- 2 Cyprus 1.06 compare
- 2 Czechia 1.06 compare
- 2 Germany 1.06 compare
- 2 Djibouti 1.06 compare
- 2 Dominica 1.06 compare
- 2 Denmark 1.06 compare
- 2 Dominican Republic 1.06 compare
- 2 Algeria 1.06 compare
- 2 Ecuador 1.06 compare
- 2 Egypt 1.06 compare
- 2 Spain 1.06 compare
- 2 Estonia 1.06 compare
- 2 Ethiopia 1.06 compare
- 2 Finland 1.06 compare
- 2 Fiji 1.06 compare
- 2 France 1.06 compare
- 2 Gabon 1.06 compare
- 2 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1.06 compare
- 2 Georgia 1.06 compare
- 2 Ghana 1.06 compare
- 2 Guinea 1.06 compare
- 2 Gambia 1.06 compare
- 2 Guinea-Bissau 1.06 compare
- 2 Equatorial Guinea 1.06 compare
- 2 Greece 1.06 compare
- 2 Grenada 1.06 compare
- 2 Guatemala 1.06 compare
- 2 Hong Kong 1.06 compare
- 2 Honduras 1.06 compare
- 2 Croatia 1.06 compare
- 2 Haiti 1.06 compare
- 2 Hungary 1.06 compare
- 2 Indonesia 1.06 compare
- 2 India 1.06 compare
- 2 Ireland 1.06 compare
- 2 Iran, Islamic Republic of 1.06 compare
- 2 Iraq 1.06 compare
- 2 Iceland 1.06 compare
- 2 Israel 1.06 compare
- 2 Italy 1.06 compare
- 2 Jamaica 1.06 compare
- 2 Jordan 1.06 compare
- 2 Japan 1.06 compare
- 2 Kazakhstan 1.06 compare
- 2 Kenya 1.06 compare
- 2 Kyrgyzstan 1.06 compare
- 2 Cambodia 1.06 compare
- 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1.06 compare
- 2 Republic of Korea 1.06 compare
- 2 Kuwait 1.06 compare
- 2 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1.06 compare
- 2 Lebanon 1.06 compare
- 2 Liberia 1.06 compare
- 2 Saint Lucia 1.06 compare
- 2 Sri Lanka 1.06 compare
- 2 Lesotho 1.06 compare
- 2 Lithuania 1.06 compare
- 2 Luxembourg 1.06 compare
- 2 Latvia 1.06 compare
- 2 Morocco 1.06 compare
- 2 Republic of Moldova 1.06 compare
- 2 Madagascar 1.06 compare
- 2 Maldives 1.06 compare
- 2 Mexico 1.06 compare
- 2 North Macedonia 1.06 compare
- 2 Mali 1.06 compare
- 2 Malta 1.06 compare
- 2 Myanmar 1.06 compare
- 2 Mongolia 1.06 compare
- 2 Mozambique 1.06 compare
- 2 Mauritania 1.06 compare
- 2 Mauritius 1.06 compare
- 2 Malawi 1.06 compare
- 2 Malaysia 1.06 compare
- 2 Namibia 1.06 compare
- 2 Niger 1.06 compare
- 2 Nigeria 1.06 compare
- 2 Nicaragua 1.06 compare
- 2 Netherlands 1.06 compare
- 2 Norway 1.06 compare
- 2 Nepal 1.06 compare
- 2 New Zealand 1.06 compare
- 2 Oman 1.06 compare
- 2 Pakistan 1.06 compare
- 2 Panama 1.06 compare
- 2 Peru 1.06 compare
- 2 Philippines 1.06 compare
- 2 Poland 1.06 compare
- 2 Portugal 1.06 compare
- 2 Paraguay 1.06 compare
- 2 Qatar 1.06 compare
- 2 Romania 1.06 compare
- 2 Russian Federation 1.06 compare
- 2 Rwanda 1.06 compare
- 2 Saudi Arabia 1.06 compare
- 2 Senegal 1.06 compare
- 2 Singapore 1.06 compare
- 2 Sierra Leone 1.06 compare
- 2 El Salvador 1.06 compare
- 2 Sao Tome and Principe 1.06 compare
- 2 Suriname 1.06 compare
- 2 Slovakia 1.06 compare
- 2 Slovenia 1.06 compare
- 2 Sweden 1.06 compare
- 2 Eswatini 1.06 compare
- 2 Seychelles 1.06 compare
- 2 Syria 1.06 compare
- 2 Chad 1.06 compare
- 2 Togo 1.06 compare
- 2 Thailand 1.06 compare
- 2 Tajikistan 1.06 compare
- 2 Turkmenistan 1.06 compare
- 2 Trinidad and Tobago 1.06 compare
- 2 Tunisia 1.06 compare
- 2 Türkiye 1.06 compare
- 2 Tanzania, United Republic of 1.06 compare
- 2 Uganda 1.06 compare
- 2 Ukraine 1.06 compare
- 2 Uruguay 1.06 compare
- 2 United States of America 1.06 compare
- 2 Uzbekistan 1.06 compare
- 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1.06 compare
- 2 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1.06 compare
- 2 Yemen 1.06 compare
- 2 South Africa 1.06 compare
- 2 Zambia 1.06 compare
- 2 Zimbabwe 1.06 compare
More trade data for Viet Nam
- Commodity Net Export Price Index, Individual Commodities Weighted by 99.91 (2025)
- Commodity Net Export Price Index, Individual Commodities Weighted by 99.82 (2025)
- Commodity Export Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 98.15 (2025)
- Commodity Export Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 85.97 (2025)
- Commodity Import Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 98.32 (2025)
- Commodity Import Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 72.13 (2025)
- Imports of low carbon technology products, Percent of GDP 3.37 (2023)
- Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per 145.21 units per person (2023)
- Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per 0.0336 units per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps 6.69 billion (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Viet Nam?
- Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent in Viet Nam was 1.06 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent recorded in Viet Nam?
- The highest recorded value was 1.11 in 1976.
- What is the lowest export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent recorded in Viet Nam?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.05 in 1995.
- How does Viet Nam rank for export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent?
- Viet Nam ranks 2nd out of 166 countries with data for 2014.
- Is export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, percent rising or falling in Viet Nam?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Export quality, 95 percent interval - upper bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.