Brazil vs Madagascar: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Brazil
0.2959
in 2014
Madagascar
0.3048
in 2014
Brazil rank
59th
Madagascar rank
58th
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Brazil
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0.3048 against 0.2959 in Brazil, a difference of 0.0089.
Across all 53 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 59th and Madagascar ranks 58th of 189 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4628 | 0.9809 | 0.5182 | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 0.3993 | 0.8215 | 0.4222 | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 0.2623 | 0.8032 | 0.541 | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 0.2243 | 0.7303 | 0.5061 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 0.2693 | 0.848 | 0.5787 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 0.3016 | 0.6419 | 0.3403 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Brazil or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 0.3048 against 0.2959 in Brazil as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Brazil and Madagascar?
- 0.0089, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Madagascar?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Madagascar rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Brazil ranks 59th and Madagascar ranks 58th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.