Comoros vs Ecuador: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Comoros
1.59
in 2014
Ecuador
1.22
in 2014
Comoros rank
11th
Ecuador rank
14th
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Comoros
- Ecuador
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 1.59 against 1.22 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.37.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 11th and Ecuador ranks 14th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.01 | 1.52 | 0.5059 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 0.5096 | 1.38 | 0.8738 | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 1.33 | 1.29 | 0.0445 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.8592 | 1.23 | 0.3743 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 1.37 | 1.12 | 0.2457 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 1.05 | 1.15 | 0.1079 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Comoros or Ecuador?
- Comoros, at 1.59 against 1.22 in Ecuador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Comoros and Ecuador?
- 0.37, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Ecuador?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Comoros and Ecuador rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Comoros ranks 11th and Ecuador ranks 14th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.