Finland vs Hungary: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Finland
0.2864
in 2014
Hungary
0.2727
in 2014
Finland rank
63rd
Hungary rank
66th
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Finland
- Hungary
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.2864 against 0.2727 in Hungary, a difference of 0.0137.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Hungary ahead.
Finland ranks 63rd and Hungary ranks 66th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 4 and Hungary in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3947 | 0.4009 | 0.0062 | Hungary |
| 1970s | 0.3478 | 0.3277 | 0.0201 | Finland |
| 1980s | 0.2838 | 0.299 | 0.0152 | Hungary |
| 1990s | 0.3042 | 0.2472 | 0.057 | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.3243 | 0.2322 | 0.0921 | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.302 | 0.282 | 0.02 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Finland or Hungary?
- Finland, at 0.2864 against 0.2727 in Hungary as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Finland and Hungary?
- 0.0137, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Hungary?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Hungary rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Finland ranks 63rd and Hungary ranks 66th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.