Finland vs Montserrat: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Finland
0.2864
in 2014
Montserrat
0.2893
in 2014
Finland rank
63rd
Montserrat rank
61st
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Finland
- Montserrat
How they compare
Montserrat currently reports 0.2893 against 0.2864 in Finland, a difference of 0.0029.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 63rd and Montserrat ranks 61st of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Montserrat in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Montserrat | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3947 | 0 | 0.3947 | Finland |
| 1970s | 0.3478 | 0.4761 | 0.1283 | Montserrat |
| 1980s | 0.2838 | 0.2872 | 0.0034 | Montserrat |
| 1990s | 0.3042 | 0.4623 | 0.1581 | Montserrat |
| 2000s | 0.3243 | 0.2811 | 0.0432 | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.302 | 0.2693 | 0.0327 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Finland or Montserrat?
- Montserrat, at 0.2893 against 0.2864 in Finland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Finland and Montserrat?
- 0.0029, with Montserrat ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Montserrat?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Montserrat rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Finland ranks 63rd and Montserrat ranks 61st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.