Guatemala vs South Sudan: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Guatemala
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.2059 against 0.1952 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0107.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 78th and South Sudan ranks 77th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.28 | 0 | 1.28 | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 1.1 | 0 | 1.1 | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 0.9088 | 0 | 0.9088 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.6676 | 0 | 0.6676 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.1852 | 0 | 0.1852 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.2247 | 0.5852 | 0.3605 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Guatemala or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.2059 against 0.1952 in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Guatemala and South Sudan?
- 0.0107, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Sudan?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and South Sudan rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Guatemala ranks 78th and South Sudan ranks 77th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.