Honduras vs Lithuania: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Honduras
0.0461
in 2014
Lithuania
0.0458
in 2014
Honduras rank
139th
Lithuania rank
140th
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Honduras
- Lithuania
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 0.0461 against 0.0458 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0003.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 139th and Lithuania ranks 140th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 5 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.59 | 0 | 1.59 | Honduras |
| 1970s | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | Honduras |
| 1980s | 1.4 | 0 | 1.4 | Honduras |
| 1990s | 0.642 | 0.0926 | 0.5494 | Honduras |
| 2000s | 0.0275 | 0.053 | 0.0255 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0733 | 0.0478 | 0.0255 | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Honduras or Lithuania?
- Honduras, at 0.0461 against 0.0458 in Lithuania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Honduras and Lithuania?
- 0.0003, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Lithuania?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Honduras and Lithuania rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Honduras ranks 139th and Lithuania ranks 140th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.