Indonesia vs Suriname: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Indonesia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.4455 against 0.4018 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0437.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Suriname ahead.
Indonesia ranks 45th and Suriname ranks 42nd of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.02 | 1.16 | 0.1416 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.9992 | 0.0865 | 0.9127 | Indonesia |
| 1980s | 0.7575 | 0.0518 | 0.7056 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.2954 | -0.0221 | 0.3176 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.2948 | -0.011 | 0.3057 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.421 | 0.4357 | 0.0147 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Indonesia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.4455 against 0.4018 in Indonesia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Indonesia and Suriname?
- 0.0437, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Suriname?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Suriname rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Indonesia ranks 45th and Suriname ranks 42nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.