Latvia vs Luxembourg: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Latvia
0.0576
in 2014
Luxembourg
0.0542
in 2014
Latvia rank
131st
Luxembourg rank
134th
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0576 against 0.0542 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.0034.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Latvia ranks 131st and Luxembourg ranks 134th of 189 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0.1406 | 0.0232 | 0.1174 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0677 | 0.0601 | 0.0076 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0617 | 0.0573 | 0.0044 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Latvia or Luxembourg?
- Latvia, at 0.0576 against 0.0542 in Luxembourg as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 0.0034, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Latvia and Luxembourg rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Latvia ranks 131st and Luxembourg ranks 134th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.