New Zealand vs Peru: Extensive Margin, Theil index
New Zealand
0.5112
in 2014
Peru
0.4954
in 2014
New Zealand rank
37th
Peru rank
38th
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- New Zealand
- Peru
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.5112 against 0.4954 in Peru, a difference of 0.0158.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 37th and Peru ranks 38th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.04 | 0.7163 | 0.3205 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 0.8311 | 0.6852 | 0.1459 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 0.6788 | 0.5848 | 0.0939 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 0.5615 | 0.5762 | 0.0147 | Peru |
| 2000s | 0.5063 | 0.5913 | 0.085 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.4605 | 0.5571 | 0.0966 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, New Zealand or Peru?
- New Zealand, at 0.5112 against 0.4954 in Peru as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between New Zealand and Peru?
- 0.0158, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Peru?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do New Zealand and Peru rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- New Zealand ranks 37th and Peru ranks 38th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.