Slovenia vs Zambia: Extensive Margin, Theil index
Slovenia
0.0017
in 2014
Zambia
0.0033
in 2014
Slovenia rank
176th
Zambia rank
173rd
Extensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Slovenia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.0033 against 0.0017 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0016.
That makes Zambia's figure about 2.0 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zambia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 176th and Zambia ranks 173rd of 189 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | 0.1578 | 0.1578 | Zambia |
| 1970s | 0 | 0.02 | 0.02 | Zambia |
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0097 | 0.0097 | Zambia |
| 1990s | 0.0247 | 0.0317 | 0.0069 | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0.0053 | 0.0204 | 0.0151 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.0029 | 0.007 | 0.0041 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher extensive margin, theil index, Slovenia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.0033 against 0.0017 in Slovenia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in extensive margin, theil index between Slovenia and Zambia?
- 0.0016, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Zambia?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Slovenia and Zambia rank globally for extensive margin, theil index?
- Slovenia ranks 176th and Zambia ranks 173rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Extensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.