Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent in Eswatini
Eswatini: Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent was 0.6056 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent in Eswatini, 2001–2014
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2014, export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent in Eswatini stood at 0.6056.
That represents a change of down 2.1% on the previous year and up 11.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent in Eswatini peaked at 0.6466 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.513, in 2002.
Eswatini ranks 2nd of 166 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0.5214 | — |
| 2002 | 0.513 | -1.6% |
| 2003 | 0.5354 | +4.4% |
| 2004 | 0.5421 | +1.2% |
| 2005 | 0.5579 | +2.9% |
| 2006 | 0.5929 | +6.3% |
| 2007 | 0.5864 | -1.1% |
| 2008 | 0.5844 | -0.3% |
| 2009 | 0.6075 | +3.9% |
| 2010 | 0.635 | +4.5% |
| 2011 | 0.6466 | +1.8% |
| 2012 | 0.6213 | -3.9% |
| 2013 | 0.6186 | -0.4% |
| 2014 | 0.6056 | -2.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5601 | 0.513 | 0.6075 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.6254 | 0.6056 | 0.6466 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 1 Sudan 0.6466 compare
- 2 Angola 0.6056 compare
- 2 Albania 0.6056 compare
- 2 United Arab Emirates 0.6056 compare
- 2 Argentina 0.6056 compare
- 2 Armenia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0.6056 compare
- 2 Australia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Austria 0.6056 compare
- 2 Azerbaijan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Burundi 0.6056 compare
- 2 Belgium 0.6056 compare
- 2 Benin 0.6056 compare
- 2 Burkina Faso 0.6056 compare
- 2 Bangladesh 0.6056 compare
- 2 Bulgaria 0.6056 compare
- 2 Bahrain 0.6056 compare
- 2 Bahamas 0.6056 compare
- 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.6056 compare
- 2 Belarus 0.6056 compare
- 2 Belize 0.6056 compare
- 2 Bolivia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Brazil 0.6056 compare
- 2 Barbados 0.6056 compare
- 2 Botswana 0.6056 compare
- 2 Central African Republic 0.6056 compare
- 2 Canada 0.6056 compare
- 2 Switzerland 0.6056 compare
- 2 Chile 0.6056 compare
- 2 China 0.6056 compare
- 2 Cote d'Ivoire 0.6056 compare
- 2 Cameroon 0.6056 compare
- 2 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.6056 compare
- 2 Congo 0.6056 compare
- 2 Colombia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Comoros 0.6056 compare
- 2 Cape Verde 0.6056 compare
- 2 Costa Rica 0.6056 compare
- 2 Cyprus 0.6056 compare
- 2 Czechia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Germany 0.6056 compare
- 2 Djibouti 0.6056 compare
- 2 Dominica 0.6056 compare
- 2 Denmark 0.6056 compare
- 2 Dominican Republic 0.6056 compare
- 2 Algeria 0.6056 compare
- 2 Ecuador 0.6056 compare
- 2 Egypt 0.6056 compare
- 2 Spain 0.6056 compare
- 2 Estonia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Ethiopia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Finland 0.6056 compare
- 2 Fiji 0.6056 compare
- 2 France 0.6056 compare
- 2 Gabon 0.6056 compare
- 2 United Kingdom 0.6056 compare
- 2 Georgia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Ghana 0.6056 compare
- 2 Guinea 0.6056 compare
- 2 Gambia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Guinea-Bissau 0.6056 compare
- 2 Equatorial Guinea 0.6056 compare
- 2 Greece 0.6056 compare
- 2 Grenada 0.6056 compare
- 2 Guatemala 0.6056 compare
- 2 Hong Kong 0.6056 compare
- 2 Honduras 0.6056 compare
- 2 Croatia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Haiti 0.6056 compare
- 2 Hungary 0.6056 compare
- 2 Indonesia 0.6056 compare
- 2 India 0.6056 compare
- 2 Ireland 0.6056 compare
- 2 Iran 0.6056 compare
- 2 Iraq 0.6056 compare
- 2 Iceland 0.6056 compare
- 2 Israel 0.6056 compare
- 2 Italy 0.6056 compare
- 2 Jamaica 0.6056 compare
- 2 Jordan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Japan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Kazakhstan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Kenya 0.6056 compare
- 2 Kyrgyzstan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Cambodia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.6056 compare
- 2 South Korea 0.6056 compare
- 2 Kuwait 0.6056 compare
- 2 Laos 0.6056 compare
- 2 Lebanon 0.6056 compare
- 2 Liberia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Saint Lucia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Sri Lanka 0.6056 compare
- 2 Lesotho 0.6056 compare
- 2 Lithuania 0.6056 compare
- 2 Luxembourg 0.6056 compare
- 2 Latvia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Morocco 0.6056 compare
- 2 Moldova 0.6056 compare
- 2 Madagascar 0.6056 compare
- 2 Maldives 0.6056 compare
- 2 Mexico 0.6056 compare
- 2 North Macedonia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Mali 0.6056 compare
- 2 Malta 0.6056 compare
- 2 Myanmar 0.6056 compare
- 2 Mongolia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Mozambique 0.6056 compare
- 2 Mauritania 0.6056 compare
- 2 Mauritius 0.6056 compare
- 2 Malawi 0.6056 compare
- 2 Malaysia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Namibia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Niger 0.6056 compare
- 2 Nigeria 0.6056 compare
- 2 Nicaragua 0.6056 compare
- 2 Netherlands 0.6056 compare
- 2 Norway 0.6056 compare
- 2 Nepal 0.6056 compare
- 2 New Zealand 0.6056 compare
- 2 Oman 0.6056 compare
- 2 Pakistan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Panama 0.6056 compare
- 2 Peru 0.6056 compare
- 2 Philippines 0.6056 compare
- 2 Poland 0.6056 compare
- 2 Portugal 0.6056 compare
- 2 Paraguay 0.6056 compare
- 2 Qatar 0.6056 compare
- 2 Romania 0.6056 compare
- 2 Russia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Rwanda 0.6056 compare
- 2 Saudi Arabia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Senegal 0.6056 compare
- 2 Singapore 0.6056 compare
- 2 Sierra Leone 0.6056 compare
- 2 El Salvador 0.6056 compare
- 2 Sao Tome and Principe 0.6056 compare
- 2 Suriname 0.6056 compare
- 2 Slovakia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Slovenia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Sweden 0.6056 compare
- 2 Seychelles 0.6056 compare
- 2 Syria 0.6056 compare
- 2 Chad 0.6056 compare
- 2 Togo 0.6056 compare
- 2 Thailand 0.6056 compare
- 2 Tajikistan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Turkmenistan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0.6056 compare
- 2 Tunisia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Turkey 0.6056 compare
- 2 Tanzania 0.6056 compare
- 2 Uganda 0.6056 compare
- 2 Ukraine 0.6056 compare
- 2 Uruguay 0.6056 compare
- 2 United States 0.6056 compare
- 2 Uzbekistan 0.6056 compare
- 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.6056 compare
- 2 Venezuela 0.6056 compare
- 2 Vietnam 0.6056 compare
- 2 Yemen 0.6056 compare
- 2 South Africa 0.6056 compare
- 2 Zambia 0.6056 compare
- 2 Zimbabwe 0.6056 compare
More trade data for Eswatini
- Commodity Net Export Price Index, Individual Commodities Weighted by 95.53 (2025)
- Commodity Net Export Price Index, Individual Commodities Weighted by 99.59 (2025)
- Commodity Export Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 98.59 (2025)
- Commodity Export Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 88.17 (2025)
- Commodity Import Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 99 (2025)
- Commodity Import Price Index, Individual Commodites Weighted by Ratio 99.56 (2025)
- Imports of low carbon technology products, Percent of GDP 0.8378 (2023)
- Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per 31.35 units per person (2023)
- Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per 0.0083 units per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Exports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps 1.63 million (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent in Eswatini?
- Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent in Eswatini was 0.6056 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6466 in 2011.
- What is the lowest export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.513 in 2002.
- How does Eswatini rank for export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent?
- Eswatini ranks 2nd out of 166 countries with data for 2014.
- Is export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.