Statizoid

Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent in Lithuania

Lithuania: Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent was 0.6056 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
0.6056
Change on year
down 2.1%
World rank
2nd
of 166 countries
All-time high
0.6466
in 2011
All-time low
0.4974
in 1995
Years of data
22
1993–2014

Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent in Lithuania, 1993–2014

00.20.40.61993200320141993: 0.5671994: 0.5371995: 0.4971996: 0.5031997: 0.5281998: 0.5191999: 0.5162000: 0.522001: 0.5212002: 0.5132003: 0.5352004: 0.5422005: 0.5582006: 0.5932007: 0.5862008: 0.5842009: 0.6072010: 0.6352011: 0.6472012: 0.6212013: 0.6192014: 0.606

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

In 2014, export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent in Lithuania stood at 0.6056.

The figure is down 2.1% on the previous year and up 11.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent in Lithuania peaked at 0.6466 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.4974, in 1995.

Lithuania ranks 2nd of 166 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 22 years of available data.

Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent in Lithuania, year by year

Year Value Change
1993 0.5667 —
1994 0.5366 -5.3%
1995 0.4974 -7.3%
1996 0.5028 +1.1%
1997 0.5278 +5.0%
1998 0.5187 -1.7%
1999 0.5161 -0.5%
2000 0.5199 +0.7%
2001 0.5214 +0.3%
2002 0.513 -1.6%
2003 0.5354 +4.4%
2004 0.5421 +1.2%
2005 0.5579 +2.9%
2006 0.5929 +6.3%
2007 0.5864 -1.1%
2008 0.5844 -0.3%
2009 0.6075 +3.9%
2010 0.635 +4.5%
2011 0.6466 +1.8%
2012 0.6213 -3.9%
2013 0.6186 -0.4%
2014 0.6056 -2.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.5237 0.4974 0.5667 7
2000s 0.5561 0.513 0.6075 10
2010s 0.6254 0.6056 0.6466 5

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 1 Sudan 0.6466 compare
  2. 2 Angola 0.6056 compare
  3. 2 Albania 0.6056 compare
  4. 2 United Arab Emirates 0.6056 compare
  5. 2 Argentina 0.6056 compare
  6. 2 Armenia 0.6056 compare
  7. 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0.6056 compare
  8. 2 Australia 0.6056 compare
  9. 2 Austria 0.6056 compare
  10. 2 Azerbaijan 0.6056 compare
  11. 2 Burundi 0.6056 compare
  12. 2 Belgium 0.6056 compare
  13. 2 Benin 0.6056 compare
  14. 2 Burkina Faso 0.6056 compare
  15. 2 Bangladesh 0.6056 compare
  16. 2 Bulgaria 0.6056 compare
  17. 2 Bahrain 0.6056 compare
  18. 2 Bahamas 0.6056 compare
  19. 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.6056 compare
  20. 2 Belarus 0.6056 compare
  21. 2 Belize 0.6056 compare
  22. 2 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.6056 compare
  23. 2 Brazil 0.6056 compare
  24. 2 Barbados 0.6056 compare
  25. 2 Botswana 0.6056 compare
  26. 2 Central African Republic 0.6056 compare
  27. 2 Canada 0.6056 compare
  28. 2 Switzerland 0.6056 compare
  29. 2 Chile 0.6056 compare
  30. 2 China (People’s Republic of) 0.6056 compare
  31. 2 Côte d'Ivoire 0.6056 compare
  32. 2 Cameroon 0.6056 compare
  33. 2 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0.6056 compare
  34. 2 Congo 0.6056 compare
  35. 2 Colombia 0.6056 compare
  36. 2 Comoros 0.6056 compare
  37. 2 Cape Verde 0.6056 compare
  38. 2 Costa Rica 0.6056 compare
  39. 2 Cyprus 0.6056 compare
  40. 2 Czechia 0.6056 compare
  41. 2 Germany 0.6056 compare
  42. 2 Djibouti 0.6056 compare
  43. 2 Dominica 0.6056 compare
  44. 2 Denmark 0.6056 compare
  45. 2 Dominican Republic 0.6056 compare
  46. 2 Algeria 0.6056 compare
  47. 2 Ecuador 0.6056 compare
  48. 2 Egypt 0.6056 compare
  49. 2 Spain 0.6056 compare
  50. 2 Estonia 0.6056 compare
  51. 2 Ethiopia 0.6056 compare
  52. 2 Finland 0.6056 compare
  53. 2 Fiji 0.6056 compare
  54. 2 France 0.6056 compare
  55. 2 Gabon 0.6056 compare
  56. 2 United Kingdom 0.6056 compare
  57. 2 Georgia 0.6056 compare
  58. 2 Ghana 0.6056 compare
  59. 2 Guinea 0.6056 compare
  60. 2 Gambia 0.6056 compare
  61. 2 Guinea-Bissau 0.6056 compare
  62. 2 Equatorial Guinea 0.6056 compare
  63. 2 Greece 0.6056 compare
  64. 2 Grenada 0.6056 compare
  65. 2 Guatemala 0.6056 compare
  66. 2 Hong Kong, China 0.6056 compare
  67. 2 Honduras 0.6056 compare
  68. 2 Croatia 0.6056 compare
  69. 2 Haiti 0.6056 compare
  70. 2 Hungary 0.6056 compare
  71. 2 Indonesia 0.6056 compare
  72. 2 India 0.6056 compare
  73. 2 Ireland 0.6056 compare
  74. 2 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.6056 compare
  75. 2 Iraq 0.6056 compare
  76. 2 Iceland 0.6056 compare
  77. 2 Israel 0.6056 compare
  78. 2 Italy 0.6056 compare
  79. 2 Jamaica 0.6056 compare
  80. 2 Jordan 0.6056 compare
  81. 2 Japan 0.6056 compare
  82. 2 Kazakhstan 0.6056 compare
  83. 2 Kenya 0.6056 compare
  84. 2 Kyrgyzstan 0.6056 compare
  85. 2 Cambodia 0.6056 compare
  86. 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.6056 compare
  87. 2 Korea 0.6056 compare
  88. 2 Kuwait 0.6056 compare
  89. 2 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0.6056 compare
  90. 2 Lebanon 0.6056 compare
  91. 2 Liberia 0.6056 compare
  92. 2 Saint Lucia 0.6056 compare
  93. 2 Sri Lanka 0.6056 compare
  94. 2 Lesotho 0.6056 compare
  95. 2 Luxembourg 0.6056 compare
  96. 2 Latvia 0.6056 compare
  97. 2 Morocco 0.6056 compare
  98. 2 Republic of Moldova 0.6056 compare
  99. 2 Madagascar 0.6056 compare
  100. 2 Maldives 0.6056 compare
  101. 2 Mexico 0.6056 compare
  102. 2 North Macedonia 0.6056 compare
  103. 2 Mali 0.6056 compare
  104. 2 Malta 0.6056 compare
  105. 2 Myanmar 0.6056 compare
  106. 2 Mongolia 0.6056 compare
  107. 2 Mozambique 0.6056 compare
  108. 2 Mauritania 0.6056 compare
  109. 2 Mauritius 0.6056 compare
  110. 2 Malawi 0.6056 compare
  111. 2 Malaysia 0.6056 compare
  112. 2 Namibia 0.6056 compare
  113. 2 Niger 0.6056 compare
  114. 2 Nigeria 0.6056 compare
  115. 2 Nicaragua 0.6056 compare
  116. 2 Netherlands 0.6056 compare
  117. 2 Norway 0.6056 compare
  118. 2 Nepal 0.6056 compare
  119. 2 New Zealand 0.6056 compare
  120. 2 Oman 0.6056 compare
  121. 2 Pakistan 0.6056 compare
  122. 2 Panama 0.6056 compare
  123. 2 Peru 0.6056 compare
  124. 2 Philippines 0.6056 compare
  125. 2 Poland 0.6056 compare
  126. 2 Portugal 0.6056 compare
  127. 2 Paraguay 0.6056 compare
  128. 2 Qatar 0.6056 compare
  129. 2 Romania 0.6056 compare
  130. 2 Russia 0.6056 compare
  131. 2 Rwanda 0.6056 compare
  132. 2 Saudi Arabia 0.6056 compare
  133. 2 Senegal 0.6056 compare
  134. 2 Singapore 0.6056 compare
  135. 2 Sierra Leone 0.6056 compare
  136. 2 El Salvador 0.6056 compare
  137. 2 Sao Tome and Principe 0.6056 compare
  138. 2 Suriname 0.6056 compare
  139. 2 Slovak Republic 0.6056 compare
  140. 2 Slovenia 0.6056 compare
  141. 2 Sweden 0.6056 compare
  142. 2 Eswatini 0.6056 compare
  143. 2 Seychelles 0.6056 compare
  144. 2 Syrian Arab Republic 0.6056 compare
  145. 2 Chad 0.6056 compare
  146. 2 Togo 0.6056 compare
  147. 2 Thailand 0.6056 compare
  148. 2 Tajikistan 0.6056 compare
  149. 2 Turkmenistan 0.6056 compare
  150. 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0.6056 compare
  151. 2 Tunisia 0.6056 compare
  152. 2 Türkiye 0.6056 compare
  153. 2 Tanzania, United Republic of 0.6056 compare
  154. 2 Uganda 0.6056 compare
  155. 2 Ukraine 0.6056 compare
  156. 2 Uruguay 0.6056 compare
  157. 2 United States 0.6056 compare
  158. 2 Uzbekistan 0.6056 compare
  159. 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.6056 compare
  160. 2 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 0.6056 compare
  161. 2 Viet Nam 0.6056 compare
  162. 2 Yemen 0.6056 compare
  163. 2 South Africa 0.6056 compare
  164. 2 Zambia 0.6056 compare
  165. 2 Zimbabwe 0.6056 compare

See the full ranking of 166 places →

More trade data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent in Lithuania?
Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent in Lithuania was 0.6056 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 0.6466 in 2011.
What is the lowest export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 0.4974 in 1995.
How does Lithuania rank for export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent?
Lithuania ranks 2nd out of 166 countries with data for 2014.
Is export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, percent rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is up 11.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural products). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/stat/export-quality-95-percent-interval-lower-bound-percent-acm1-agricultural-products/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/stat/export-quality-95-percent-interval-lower-bound-percent-acm1-agricultural-products/lithuania/">Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Export quality, 95 percent interval - lower bound, Percent (ACM1. Agricultural products)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 7,433 data points, 1963–2014
Last refreshed

This dataset provides export quality indicators for over 800 products across 166 countries from 1963 to 2014, resulting in over 1.7 million observations. Higher index values indicate higher quality, and the index is normalized with a value of 1 representing the 90th percentile of export quality among all exporters (the world frontier). Data can be aggregated at various levels, including by product according to the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) up to the 4-digit level, by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) up to the 3-digit level, and by aggregate sectors such as Agriculture, Commodities, and Manufactures.